International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Volume 11, Issue 2 , Pages 166-171, March 2007

Field performance and new uses of rapid influenza testing in Thailand

  • James Mark Simmerman

      Affiliations

    • World Health Organization, 63 Tran Hung Dao Street, Hanoi, Vietnam
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +84 4 943 3738; fax: +84 4 943 3740.
  • ,
  • Malinee Chittaganpitch

      Affiliations

    • National Institutes of Health, Thailand Ministry of Public Health, Tivanon Road, Nonthaburi, 11000 Thailand
  • ,
  • Dean Erdman

      Affiliations

    • Division of Viral Respiratory Diseases, Coordinating Center for Infectious Disease, US Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA, USA
  • ,
  • Pongpun Sawatwong

      Affiliations

    • The International Emerging Infections Program, US CDC-Thailand MOPH Collaboration, Bangkok, Thailand
  • ,
  • Timothy M. Uyeki

      Affiliations

    • Influenza Division, Coordinating Center for Infectious Disease, US Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA, USA
  • ,
  • Scott F. Dowell

      Affiliations

    • Coordinating Office of Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA, USA

Received 14 October 2005; received in revised form 1 January 2006; accepted 11 January 2006.

Corresponding Editor: Jane Zuckerman, London, UK

Summary 

Objectives

Rapid influenza tests are increasingly used in surveillance systems and for clinical care in Southeast Asia. However, the performance and utility of rapid influenza tests under field conditions in rural Southeast Asia has not been evaluated.

Methods

In the context of a larger study on the causes of respiratory illness in rural Thailand, we used a rapid test to collect data on influenza burden, seasonality, and cost of illness. We compared the performance of the QuickVue® Influenza Test to tissue cell viral culture and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) among 1092 Thai patients meeting the World Health Organization case definition for influenza-like illness over a 12-month period.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of the QuickVue test compared to viral culture were 77% and 96%, respectively. Rapid influenza tests were useful to describe the seasonality of influenza, estimate the cost of illness, increase the sensitivity of surveillance, conduct outbreak responses, and guide evaluation of suspected avian influenza virus infections.

Conclusions

Despite their high cost, rapid influenza diagnostic tests are useful tools for influenza research, surveillance, and outbreak investigations in Southeast Asia.

Keywords: Influenza, Rapid tests, Performance

 

PII: S1201-9712(06)00080-4

doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2006.01.005

International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Volume 11, Issue 2 , Pages 166-171, March 2007