International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Volume 13, Issue 3 , Pages 410-418, May 2009

Personal digital assistants to collect tuberculosis bacteriology data in Peru reduce delays, errors, and workload, and are acceptable to users: cluster randomized controlled trial

  • Joaquín A. Blaya

      Affiliations

    • Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
    • Partners In Health, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 617 432 6754 fax: +1 617 432 5300.
  • ,
  • Ted Cohen

      Affiliations

    • Division of Social Medicine and Health Inequalities, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
  • ,
  • Pablo Rodríguez

      Affiliations

    • Socios en Salud Sucursal Peru, Lima, Peru
  • ,
  • Jihoon Kim

      Affiliations

    • Decision Systems Group, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
  • ,
  • Hamish S.F. Fraser

      Affiliations

    • Partners In Health, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
    • Division of Social Medicine and Health Inequalities, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Received 30 November 2007; received in revised form 18 September 2008; accepted 24 September 2008. published online 19 December 2008.

Corresponding Editor: William Cameron, Ottawa, Canada

Summary 

Objectives

To evaluate the effectiveness of a personal digital assistant (PDA)-based system for collecting tuberculosis test results and to compare this new system to the previous paper-based system. The PDA- and paper-based systems were evaluated based on processing times, frequency of errors, and number of work-hours expended by data collectors.

Methods

We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial in 93 health establishments in Peru. Baseline data were collected for 19 months. Districts (n=4) were then randomly assigned to intervention (PDA) or control (paper) groups, and further data were collected for 6 months. Comparisons were made between intervention and control districts and within-districts before and after the introduction of the intervention.

Results

The PDA-based system had a significant effect on processing times (p<0.001) and errors (p=0.005). In the between-districts comparison, the median processing time for cultures was reduced from 23 to 8 days and for smears was reduced from 25 to 12 days. In that comparison, the proportion of cultures with delays >90 days was reduced from 9.2% to 0.1% and the number of errors was decreased by 57.1%. The intervention reduced the work-hours necessary to process results by 70% and was preferred by all users.

Conclusions

A well-designed PDA-based system to collect data from institutions over a large, resource-poor area can significantly reduce delays, errors, and person-hours spent processing data.

Keywords: Handheld computer, Personal digital assistant, Evaluation studies, Developing countries, Tuberculosis

 

PII: S1201-9712(08)01527-0

doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2008.09.015

International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Volume 13, Issue 3 , Pages 410-418, May 2009