International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Volume 13, Issue 6 , Pages 701-706, November 2009

Bladder irrigation with amphotericin B and fungal urinary tract infection—systematic review with meta-analysis

  • Felipe Francisco Tuon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, 4 andar. Sala 4028 – ICHC, Cerqueira Cesar, CEP 05403-010, São Paulo, Brazil
    • Clinic of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Hospital Universitário Evangelico de Curitiba, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +55 11 30696530; fax: +55 11 30697508.
  • ,
  • Valdir Sabbaga Amato

      Affiliations

    • Infectious and Parasitic Diseases Clinic, Hospital das Clínicas, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • ,
  • Sergio Ricardo Penteado Filho

      Affiliations

    • Clinic of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Hospital Universitário Evangelico de Curitiba, Curitiba, PR, Brazil

Received 24 April 2008; received in revised form 8 September 2008; accepted 20 October 2008. published online 20 January 2009.

Corresponding Editor: Andy I.M. Hoepelman, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Article Outline

Summary 

Background

Candiduria is a hospital-associated infection and a daily problem in the intensive care unit. The treatment of asymptomatic candiduria is not well established and the use of amphotericin B bladder irrigation (ABBI) is controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the best place for this therapy in practice.

Methods

The databases searched in this study included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and LILACS (January 1960–June 2007). We included manuscripts with data on the treatment of candiduria using ABBI. The studies were classified as comparative, dose-finding, or non-comparative.

Results

From 213 studies, nine articles (377 patients) met our inclusion criteria. ABBI showed a higher clearance of the candiduria 24hours after the end of therapy than fluconazole (odds ratio (OR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32–1.00). Fungal culture 5 days after the end of both therapies showed a similar response (OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.81–2.80). The evaluation of ABBI using an intermittent or continuous system of delivery showed an early candiduria clearance (24hours after therapy) of 80% and 82%, respectively (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.52–1.36). Candiduria clearance at >5 days after the therapy showed a superior response using continuous bladder irrigation with amphotericin B (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29–0.94). The use of continuous ABBI for more than 5 days showed a better result (88% vs. 78%) than ABBI for less than 5 days, but without significance (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34–1.04).

Conclusion

Although the strength of the results in the underlying literature is not sufficient to allow the drawing of definitive conclusions, ABBI appears to be as effective as fluconazole, but it does not offer systemic antifungal therapy and should only be used for asymptomatic candiduria.

Keywords: Candida, Urinary tract infection, Bladder, Amphotericin B, Funguria, Candiduria

 

Back to Article Outline

Introduction 

Candiduria is a hospital-associated infection with increasing frequency, although most of these cases have been considered as contamination. Furthermore, patients with diabetes mellitus or a urinary catheter outside the hospital also have a high prevalence of candiduria. In a previous study, 5% of the urine cultures from a large metropolitan teaching-hospital were positive for fungi.1 Also, it was reported that almost 25% of hospitalized nursing-home patients with indwelling urinary catheters had urine cultures positive for yeast cells.2 After contamination, the second cause of candiduria is colonization. These two fungal problems are recognized after repetition of the urine culture plus association with common risk factors, such as antibiotic use and presence of an indwelling urinary catheter.

Clinicians have experienced difficulties managing candiduria in the intensive care unit. Several guidelines have been published, but controversies about its management continue. Candiduria can be related to Candida pyelonephritis, candidemia, Candida cystitis, or may be asymptomatic. The differential diagnosis of these conditions is difficult. Candida cystitis is very rare because the bladder wall is extremely resistant. Candida pyelonephritis is also rare and always associated with systemic signs and urinary tract obstruction. Currently, there is no method of differentiating upper tract from lower tract candidiasis, and pathognomonic signs of upper infections such as Candida casts and fungal balls on ultrasound are extremely rare. The main reason why clinicians treat patients with asymptomatic candiduria is the risk of associated candidemia. Candiduria can be associated with fungemia in more than 10% of cases, and PCR of blood samples from patients with candiduria increases the diagnosis rate of candidemia.3 However no difference in genetic background between blood and urine strains of Candida species has been found.4

The treatment of asymptomatic candiduria (without fever) is not well established because the natural history of this entity is unknown. It has been shown that continuous amphotericin B bladder irrigation eradicates the lower tract Candida infection or colonization, and is a potentially useful test for locating the site of infection (upper or lower).2

The treatment of candiduria with amphotericin B bladder irrigation (ABBI) is controversial. Recent studies have shown the efficacy of azoles in the treatment of asymptomatic candiduria, and ABBI treatment has, for the most part, been abandoned. Some clinical trials have compared the two methods of treatment, however, doubts remain.

Amphotericin was discovered more than 50 year ago and its use in bladder irrigation was described in 1960.5 Since then, several manuscripts on its use have been published, but information on the dose, duration, and method of ABBI is lacking. In this systematic review we performed an extensive search of articles on this subject; most of them are reviews and expert opinions. We listed all the in vivo studies to show the evidence in the literature on the use of amphotericin by this route, and sought to determine the best place for this therapy in practice.

Back to Article Outline

Materials and methods 

Search strategy 

A systematic search of the medical literature was performed as previously described.6, 7, 8 The databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and LILACS (January 1960–June 2007), as well as the Cochrane Library database up to 2007. The search terms used were ‘amphotericin’, ‘irrigation’, and ‘catheter’. Other search terms used were: ‘candiduria’, ‘funguria’, ‘candidiasis’, and ‘bladder’. Bibliographies from the studies were also reviewed.

Study selection 

The articles were selected with no language restriction. We included manuscripts with data on the treatment of candiduria using ABBI. The diagnosis of candiduria was based on quantitative or qualitative culture, with Candida spp in at least two samples. The studies were classified as comparative (ABBI vs. another drug), dose-finding (comparisons of different dosing regimens of ABBI), or non-comparative (single-armed studies). For the comparative and dose-finding studies we assessed the adequacy of methods for further calculation and, if possible, included these in a meta-analysis. Single-armed studies were allocated sequentially and response to treatment was evaluated (see data extraction).

Data extraction 

Cases included patients with diagnostic criteria for asymptomatic candiduria defined microbiologically, as previously described.9 All studies needed to provide (1) data necessary for the computation of the clearance and treatment failure of the candiduria; (2) information to establish internal and external validity: randomized, blinded, prospective, controlled (placebo vs. other drug), number and age of patients, patient origin and follow-up, culture methodology; (3) indication of fungal therapy; (4) the dose, duration, and method (intermittent vs. continuous) of ABBI; (5) the dose and duration of the other antifungal therapy (controlled trial).

Statistical analysis 

The validation of this systematic review was based on guidelines to guarantee quality, as well as good article selection and data extraction.10, 11, 12 The parameters evaluated were: fluconazole vs. ABBI, continuous vs. intermittent ABBI, and continuous ABBI for less than 5 days vs. ABBI for more than 5 days. Candiduria clearance was compared by percentage of response using urine culture at 24–72hours (early) and after 5 days (late); Chi-square odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using SPSS 11.5 and significance was set at a p value of <0.05.

Back to Article Outline

Results 

Description of studies included 

The search strategy yielded a total of 213 studies, of which 182 were excluded after initial screening. From the 31 remaining articles, nine (377 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The number of controlled and randomized studies was sufficient to perform a meta-analysis (Figure 1).

Study validity and data quality 

Of the nine studies selected, 2, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23all were prospective with hospitalized adult patients. Five studies were randomized and controlled. Data on the method of diagnosis and species found are described in Table 1. Three studies compared ABBI with intravenous fluconazole. All studies allowed a comparison of indirectly continuous vs. intermittent ABBI. Studies that evaluated continuous ABBI allowed the comparison of more than 5 days of therapy against less than 5 days.

Table 1. Studies included in the meta-analysis to evaluate the response to amphotericin B bladder irrigation in asymptomatic candiduria.
Author, year, countryNWeight of each studyaAgeProspective or retrospectiveRandomizedControlledPlacebo>10 patients with treatmentPatient originBlinded treatmentFollow-upCulture methodologySpecies identification
Nesbit, 1999, USA267%AdultsProspectiveYesYesNoYesHospitalNoNS≥104 cfu/mlUnknown
Trinh, 199520, USA205%AdultsProspectiveYesYesNoYesHospitalNoNSQualitativeUnknown
Wise, 198221, USA4011%AdultsProspectiveNoNoNoYesHospitalNoHospital discharge≥103 cfu/mlC. albicans
Wise, 197322, USA103%AdultsProspectiveNoNoNoNoHospitalNoHospital dischargeQualitativeC. albicans
Jacobs, 1996, USA3910%AdultsProspectiveYesYesNoYesHospitalNo30 days≥104 cfu/mlCandida spp
Leu, 199519, China8823%AdultsProspectiveYesYesYesYesHospitalNo7 days≥103 cfu/mlCandida spp
Fan-Havard, 199523, USA359%AdultsProspectiveYesYesNoYesHospitalNo16 daysQualitativeCandida spp
Hsu, 19902, China6517%AdultsProspectiveNoNoNoYesHospitalNoUnknownQualitativeUnknown
Fong, 199518, Canada5414%AdultsProspectiveNoNoNoYesHospitalNoUnknown≥105 cfu/mlCandida spp

Total377100%

NS, not stated.

aThe weight is the total number of patients per study divided by the total number of patients in all studies.

Results of the variables 

In comparison with intravenous fluconazole, ABBI showed a higher clearance of the candiduria 24hours after the end of therapy (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32–1.00). Fungal culture 5 days after the end of both therapies showed a similar response (OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.81–2.80) (Figure 2; Table 2).

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 2. 

    Comparison between amphotericin B bladder irrigation (intermittent or continuous) and fluconazole in the treatment of asymptomatic candiduria. The relative risk is related to candiduria persistence. The upper graph shows the evaluation of urine culture 24hours after therapy and the lower graph shows the evaluation of urine culture 1 week after therapy.

Table 2. Studies comparing fluconazole and amphotericin B bladder irrigation in the treatment of asymptomatic candiduria.
Author, year, countryNIndicationDrugDoseDuration (mean)Clearance of candiduria (24 hours)%Clearance of candiduria (>5 days)%
Jacobs, 1996, USA39Persistent candiduriaAmphBcont50mg/l5 days3385%13/1776%
29Fluconazole100mg4 days2069%15/1979%
Leu, 199519, China30Persistent candiduriaAmphBint100mg/l2687%13/1968%
30AmphBint200mg/l2583%15/2268%
29Fluconazole100mg4 days1759%17/2277%
Fan-Havard, 199523, USA17Persistent candiduriaAmphBcont50mg/l1 day1482%9/1275%
18AmphBcont50mg/l7 days1794%11/1479%
18Fluconazole100mg7 days1583%10/1377%

AmphBcont, continuous bladder irrigation with amphotericin B; AmphBint, intermittent bladder irrigation with amphotericin B.

The evaluation of ABBI using an intermittent or continuous system of delivery showed an early candiduria clearance (24hours after therapy) of 80% for intermittent and 82% for continuous (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.52–1.36). The candiduria clearance at ≥7 days after the therapy showed a superior response using continuous bladder irrigation with amphotericin B (79%) vs. intermittent irrigation (60%) (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29–0.94) (Table 3).

Table 3. Studies comparing continuous and intermittent amphotericin B bladder irrigation in the treatment of asymptomatic candiduria.
Author, year, countryNIndicationDoseDuration (mean)Clearance of candiduria (24 hours)%Clearance of candiduria (>5 days)%
Continuous bladder irrigation with amphotericin B
Nesbit, 1999, USA13Candiduria10mg/l3 days862%
1350mg/l3 days13100%
Wise, 198221, USA40Persistent candiduria50mg/l6 days3793%12/1486%
Wise, 197322, USA10Persistent candiduria50mg/l5 days770%
Jacobs, 1996, USA39Funguria50mg/l5 days3385%13/1776%
Trinh, 199520, USA10Candiduria50mg/l2 days880%
Fan-Havard, 199523, USA17Persistent candiduria50mg/l1 day1482%9/1275%
187 days1794%11/1479%
Hsu, 19902, China65Candiduria50mg/l2 days4772%
Total225 18482%45/5779%

Intermittent bladder irrigation with amphotericin B
Trinh, 199520, USA10Candiduria10mg/100ml3×/24h330%
Leu, 199519, China28Persistent candiduria1mg/200ml3×/24h2382%9/2143%
3020mg/200ml3×/24h2687%13/1968%
3040mg/200ml3×/24h2583%15/2268%
Fong, 199518, Canada54Persistent candiduria30mg/100ml1×/24h4481%

Total152 12180%37/6260%

The use of continuous bladder irrigation with amphotericin B for more than 5 days showed a better result than ABBI for less than 5 days (88% versus 78%), but without significance (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34–1.04) (Table 4).

Table 4. Studies comparing different time-periods of continuous amphotericin B bladder irrigation in the treatment of asymptomatic candiduria.
Author, year, countryNIndicationDoseDuration (mean)Clearance of candiduria%
Continuous bladder irrigation with amphotericin B (<5 days)
Nesbit, 1999, USA13Candiduria50mg/l3 days13100%
Trinh, 199520, USA10Candiduria50mg/l2 days880%
Hsu, 19902, China65Candiduria50mg/l2 days4772%
Fan-Havard, 199523, USA17Persistent candiduria50mg/l1 day1482%
Total105 8278%

Continuous bladder irrigation with amphotericin B (≥5 days)
Fan-Havard, 199523, USA18Persistent candiduria50mg/l7 days1794%
Wise, 198221, USA40Persistent candiduria50mg/l6 days3793%
Wise, 197322, USA10Persistent candiduria50mg/l5 days770%
Jacobs, 1996, USA39Funguria50mg/l5 days3385%
Total107 9488%

Back to Article Outline

Discussion 

This meta-analysis compared the different methods used to treat asymptomatic candiduria, showing a better clearance of the Candida in the first days using amphotericin B irrigation than fluconazole, but with no difference between these approaches after one week. Considering this fact, clinicians may use either therapy. If ABBI is the preferred method, a continuous delivery over 5 days is the ideal. Sobel et al. compared fungal eradication using fluconazole or placebo daily for 14 days, in 316 patients with asymptomatic candiduria.13 Fluconazole cleared candiduria by day 14 in 50%; this was only 29% in the placebo group. Unfortunately, cultures at 2 weeks revealed similar candiduria rates among treated and untreated patients using a bladder catheter. This study showed that treatment may result in a short-term clearance of the colonization, but that catheter removal is the main treatment required to avoid new colonization and further infection.14

The heterogeneity of data from our study does not allow us to confirm the results. It was not possible to draw any definitive conclusions from the comparison of fluconazole and intermittent or continuous ABBI and the duration of ABBI. This meta-analysis has several biases. The selection of the studies was done well, but data extraction was difficult. Papers used different inclusion criteria for patients, the method of culture was often poorly described, and we could not separate studies using quantitative from qualitative methods. Although all studies were prospective, patient underlying diseases were not described. We believe that this was the greatest problem in this meta-analysis. The duration of follow-up of the patients was short; a 30-day follow-up should be performed, including the rate of mortality, to determine the real benefits of therapy against candiduria.

ABBI requires the use of a new three-way catheter and drug disposal by an uncommon route. Fong et al.18 determined the minimal concentration of amphotericin B necessary to kill Candida in urine samples from hospitalized patients. Nevertheless, this study determined in vitro measures and several articles from this systematic review showed positive urine for Candida 24hours after therapy.

A major problem of ABBI is the scarcity of publications using the same method to compare with other therapies. We showed that continuous irrigation is better than intermittent. Therefore, we investigated the duration of continuous irrigation. The use of ABBI for a median of 2 days was less effective than its use for a median of 5.5 days.

Several opinions have been published recommending abandoning the use of ABBI. Drew et al. considered that ABBI is rarely needed in present day clinical practice, and that other therapeutic modalities should be used.15 Nevertheless, amphotericin is easy to administer, does not have drug interactions, and is useful in anuric patients with purulent cystitis caused by Candida and other yeasts.

Untreated candiduria may lead to further complications, such as fungus ball formation, systemic dissemination, or renal candidiasis, due to the spread of infection by the ascending route, mainly in oliguric patients. Nevertheless, these events are very rare. Whether or not any candiduria requires treatment is controversial. Candiduria will spontaneously remit without therapy, although this may take several months.16 One study, however, indicated that mortality increased significantly in patients with candiduria who did not receive antifungal treatment.17

Although the strength of the underlying literature is not sufficient to allow the drawing of definitive conclusions, we believe that ABBI can be used in patients with asymptomatic candiduria showing risk of dissemination (pyuria, oliguria, urinary tract obstruction, patients using cystostomy). ABBI appears to be as effective as fluconazole, and the best method involves continuous irrigation for more than 5 days. Local irrigation does not offer systemic antifungal therapy and should only be used for asymptomatic candiduria.

A practicing urologist, Gilbert Wise, said: “until such time as an effective treatment is available, amphotericin B irrigation should remain in the armamentarium of the clinician”.

Back to Article Outline

Acknowledgements 

We thank Dr Alan Brito Neves for reviewing the manuscript.

Conflict of interest: The authors have no commercial relationships or other associations that might pose a conflict of interest (e.g., pharmaceutical stock ownership, consultancy, advisory board membership, relevant patents, or research funding).

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Occhipinti DJ, Gubbins PO, Schreckenberger P. Frequency, pathogenicity and microbiologic outcome of non-Candida albicans candiduria. Eur J Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994;13:459–467
  2. Hsu CC, Ukleja B. Clearance of Candida colonizing the urinary bladder by a two-day amphotericin B irrigation. Infection. 1990;18:280–282
  3. Talluri G, Mangone C, Freyle J, Shirazian D, Lehman H, Wise GJ. Polymerase chain reaction used to detect candidemia in patients with candiduria. Urology. 1998;51:501–505
  4. Bougnoux ME, Kac G, Aegerter P, d’Enfert C, Fagon JY. Candidemia and candiduria in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units in France: incidence, molecular diversity, management and outcome. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:292–299
  5. Goldman HJ, Littman ML, Oppenheimer GD, Glickman SI. Monilial cystitis-effective treatment with instillation of amphotericin B. JAMA. 1960;174:359–362
  6. Amato VS, Tuon FF, Siqueira AM, Nicodemo AC, Amato Neto V. Treatment of Mucosal leishmaniasis in Latin America: systematic review. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77:266–274
  7. Tuon FF. A systematic literature review on the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from bronchoalveolar lavage clinical samples. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2007;24:89–94
  8. Tuon FF, Litvoc MN, Lopes MI. Adenosine deaminase and tuberculous pericarditis—a systematic review with meta-analysis. Acta Trop. 2006;99:67–74
  9. Kauffman CA, Candiduria . Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(Suppl 6):S371–S376
  10. Devillé WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, Montori VM, de Vet HC, van der Windt DA. Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002;2:9
  11. Jadad AR, McQuay HJ. Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: a systematic qualitative review of their methodology. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:235–243
  12. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:1271–1278
  13. Sobel JD, Kauffman CA, McKinsey D, Zervos M, Vazquez JA, Karchmer AW. Candiduria: a randomized, double-blind study of treatment with fluconazole and placebo. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Mycoses Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:19–24
  14. Sobel JD. Controversies in the diagnosis of candiduria: what is the critical colony count. Curr Treat Opt Infect Dis. 2002;4:81–83
  15. Drew RH, Arthur RR, Perfect JR. Is it time to abandon the use of amphotericin B bladder irrigation?. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:1465–1470
  16. Nesbit SA, Katz LE, McClain BW, Murphy DP. Comparison of two concentrations of amphotericin B bladder irrigation in the treatment of funguria in patients with indwelling urinary catheters. Am J Health Sys Pharm. 1999;56:872–875
  17. Wise GJ, Goldberg P, Kozinn PJ. Genitourinary candidiasis: diagnosis and treatment. J Urol. 1976;116:778–780
  18. Fong IW. The value of a single amphotericin B bladder washout in candiduria. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995;36:1067–1071
  19. Leu HS, Huang CT. Clearance of funguria with short-course antifungal regimens: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:1152–1157
  20. Trinh T, Simonian J, Vigil S, Chin D, Bidair M. Continuous versus intermittent bladder irrigation of amphotericin B for the treatment of candiduria. J Urol. 1995;154:2032–2034
  21. Wise GJ, Kozinn PJ, Goldberg P. Amphotericin B as a urologic irrigant in the management of noninvasive candiduria. J Urol. 1982;128:82–84
  22. Wise GJ, Wainstein S, Goldberg P, Kozinn PJ. Candidal cystitis. Management by continuous bladder irrigation with amphotericin B. JAMA. 1973;224:1636–1637
  23. Fan-Havard P, O’Donovan C, Smith SM, Oh J, Bamberger M, Eng RH. Oral fluconazole versus amphotericin B bladder irrigation for treatment of candidal funguria. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21:960–965

PII: S1201-9712(08)01739-6

doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2008.10.012

International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Volume 13, Issue 6 , Pages 701-706, November 2009