Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 78, P72-77, January 2019

Adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women with acute Rubella infections in Mwanza city, Tanzania

Open AccessPublished:October 31, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2018.10.020

      Highlights

      • About one tenth of pregnant women had acute rubella infections.
      • IgM seropositivity decreased significantly with gestation age.
      • More than ¾ of IgM seropositive women had adverse pregnancy outcomes.
      • One tenth of IgM positive women delivered neonates with CRS.

      Abstract

      Objective

      This study investigated the adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women with acute Rubella infections in the city of Mwanza, Tanzania.

      Methods

      A longitudinal study was conducted between 2014 and 2016 among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics. Women were screened for Rubella IgG and IgM antibodies using enzyme immunoassay (EIA). IgM seropositive pregnant women were followed up until the end of the pregnancy to determine Congenital Rubella Syndrome, congenital infections and other pregnancy outcomes.

      Results

      The median age of 685 enrolled pregnant women was 23 (IQR: 19–27) years. A total of 629(91.8%) were Rubella IgG seropositive while 61 (8.9%) were IgM seropositive. The IgM seropositivity was found to decrease significantly from first trimester to third trimester, p < 0.001. Forty six (83.6%) of 55 Rubella IgM seropositive women had adverse pregnancy outcomes and 6 (10.9%) delivered neonates with CRS, making the overall incidence of CRS to be 6/685 (0.87%). First trimester IgM seropositive women had significantly higher adverse pregnancy outcomes than those in second/third trimesters (70.4% vs. 35.7, p = 0.01).

      Conclusion

      There is one case of CRS in every 100 pregnancies necessitating additional strategies to reach a goal of elimination of CRS in developing countries.

      Keywords

      Introduction

      Rubella is an enveloped, single-stranded RNA positive sense virus of the genus Rubivirus in the family Togaviridae (
      • Frey T.K.
      Molecular biology of rubella virus.
      ). The portal of entry of rubella virus is the respiratory epithelium of the nasopharynx possibly through myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein receptor (
      • Cong H.
      • Jiang Y.
      • Tien P.
      Identification of the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein as a cellular receptor for rubella virus.
      ). The virus invades the respiratory epithelium and then spreads hematogenously and replicates in the reticuloendothelial system. In the secondary viraemic phase, rubella virus can be detected in various body sites including lymph nodes, urine, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), conjunctival sac, breast milk, synovial fluid, and lungs.
      In susceptible pregnant women, especially when the virus is contracted during the first trimester, maternal viraemia frequently infects placental tissues and the foetus (
      • Grillner L.
      • Forsgren M.
      • Barr B.
      • Böttiger M.
      • Danielsson L.
      • De Verdier C.
      Outcome of rubella during pregnancy with special reference to the 17th-24th weeks of gestation.
      ). The virus then spreads through the vascular system of the developing foetus causing damage to blood vessels and developing organs. The teratogenicity of Rubella is due to several mechanisms such as direct cytopathic effects that trigger apoptosis and the arrest of the mitosis as the result of the derangements of the cytoskeleton, which lead to the arrest of the organ development. Another well described mechanism is the interactions of retinoblastoma (Rb) genes with viral products (putative replicase NSP90) which interfere with foetal cell growth (
      • Lee J.-Y.
      • Bowden D.S.
      Rubella virus replication and links to teratogenicity.
      ). These two mechanisms result into multiple organ defects referred to as Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS).
      The disease is found worldwide with a seasonal distribution. However, little is known regarding the seasonality of Rubella cases especially in resource-limited countries. The data on confirmed cases by month of rash onset from different laboratories indicate that there are variations in Africa. In the Eastern African sub-region, where Tanzania is located, there seems to be a biphasic seasonal pattern with peaks occurring in March–April and September–October (
      • Goodson J.L.
      • Masresha B.
      • Dosseh A.
      • Byabamazima C.
      • Nshimirimana D.
      • Cochi S.
      • et al.
      Rubella epidemiology in Africa in the prevaccine era 2002–2009.
      ).
      Rubella virus infection in early pregnancy has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as congenital Rubella syndrome (CRS), abortions, still birth etc. In high-income countries where strategic Rubella immunization has been implemented, the number of CRS cases have been extensively reduced and most of these countries are in the Rubella elimination phase (
      • Noah N.D.
      • Fowle S.E.
      Immunity to rubella in women of childbearing age in the United Kingdom.
      ,
      • Ukkonen P.
      • von Bonsdorff C.-H.
      Rubella immunity and morbidity: effects of vaccination in Finland.
      ). However, Rubella remains a public health problem in most of resource constrained countries particularly in the sub-Saharan Africa (
      • Binnicker M.
      • Jespersen D.
      • Harring J.
      Multiplex detection of IgM and IgG class antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii, rubella virus, and cytomegalovirus using a novel multiplex flow immunoassay.
      ,
      • Katow S.
      Rubella virus genome diagnosis during pregnancy and mechanism of congenital rubella.
      ).
      In recent years, there have been increasing reports of congenital anomalies in most African countries with unidentified causes (
      • Bickler S.W.
      • Sanno-Duanda B.
      Epidemiology of paediatric surgical admissions to a government referral hospital in the Gambia.
      ,
      • Mashuda F.
      • Zuechner A.
      • Chalya P.L.
      • Kidenya B.R.
      • Manyama M.
      Pattern and factors associated with congenital anomalies among young infants admitted at Bugando medical centre, Mwanza, Tanzania.
      ,
      • Ndibazza J.
      • Lule S.
      • Nampijja M.
      • Mpairwe H.
      • Oduru G.
      • Kiggundu M.
      • et al.
      A description of congenital anomalies among infants in Entebbe, Uganda.
      ). Maternal infections such as syphilis and Rubella are a significant cause of congenital anomalies in low- and middle-income countries. By the year 2016, only 12 African countries had introduced Rubella vaccination in their national immunization programs to reduce incidences of acute Rubella virus infections and CRS cases (
      • WHO
      WHO position paper on rubella vaccines.
      ). In Africa, the level of Rubella natural immunity has been found to be as high as 97.9% while in Tanzania particularly it has been found to be 92.6% among pregnant women and 93% among children and adolescents (
      • Mirambo M.M.
      • Aboud S.
      • Groß U.
      • Majigo M.
      • Mushi M.F.
      • Mshana S.E.
      Rubella seromarkers and determinants of infection among tanzanian children and adolescents in prevaccination era: are we in the right track?.
      ,
      • Mwambe B.
      • Mirambo M.M.
      • Mshana S.E.
      • Massinde A.N.
      • Kidenya B.R.
      • Michael D.
      • et al.
      Sero-positivity rate of rubella and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Mwanza, Tanzania.
      ). Despite the reported high level of natural immunity, a significant proportion of child bearing aged women in Tanzania are still susceptible to acute Rubella virus infection that can lead to CRS (
      • Mirambo M.M.
      • Majigo M.
      • Aboud S.
      • Groß U.
      • Mshana S.E.
      Serological makers of rubella infection in Africa in the pre vaccination era: a systematic review.
      ,
      • Mwambe B.
      • Mirambo M.M.
      • Mshana S.E.
      • Massinde A.N.
      • Kidenya B.R.
      • Michael D.
      • et al.
      Sero-positivity rate of rubella and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Mwanza, Tanzania.
      ). Previous studies in Africa (
      • Mirambo M.M.
      • Majigo M.
      • Aboud S.
      • Groß U.
      • Mshana S.E.
      Serological makers of rubella infection in Africa in the pre vaccination era: a systematic review.
      ) reported pregnant women with positive Rubella IgM antibodies indicating acute Rubella virus infections, however no follow up studies have been done to establish the associated adverse pregnancy outcomes. Data regarding outcomes of acute Rubella virus infection are limited in most of the resource limited countries. Previous studies (
      • Mirambo M.M.
      • Chibwe E.
      • Mushi M.F.
      • Majigo M.
      • Mshana S.E.
      Cytomegalovirus, parvovirus B19 and rubella co-infection among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Mwanza city: the need to be considered in Tanzanian antenatal care package.
      ,
      • Mwambe B.
      • Mirambo M.M.
      • Mshana S.E.
      • Massinde A.N.
      • Kidenya B.R.
      • Michael D.
      • et al.
      Sero-positivity rate of rubella and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Mwanza, Tanzania.
      ) in Tanzania did not ascertain the adverse outcome of acute Rubella virus among pregnant women. Therefore, this study was undertaken to investigate the magnitude of Rubella virus infection and adverse outcomes associated with acute Rubella virus infection during the course of pregnancy in Tanzania.

      Material and methods

      Study design, setting, data and specimen collection

      A longitudinal study was conducted between 2014 and 2016 among pregnant women attending Karume and Makongoro antenatal clinics, in the city of Mwanza, Tanzania. Pregnant women were enrolled randomly. Sociodemographic and other relevant clinical data were collected using structured data collection tool. About 5 ml of blood sample was collected using plain vacutainer tube (BD®, Nairobi, Kenya) from each consented participant and transported to the Catholic University of Health and Allied sciences (CUHAS) multipurpose laboratory for further processing.

      The sample size

      Sample size was estimated by Kish Leslie formula using prevalence of 50% in order to obtain maximum sample size. In order to obtain at least 30 women required to have a significant proportion, a total of 685 pregnant women were enrolled. Regarding the outcome of pregnancy among Rubella IgM seropositive pregnant women, we intended to follow up at least 50% of positive women to provide description of the adverse pregnancy outcomes.

      Detection of rubella antibodies

      Sera were tested for specific Rubella IgG and IgM using commercially available indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Chem Well® 2910-Awareness Technology Inc., USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. As per WHO standards, Rubella IgG titers of  ≥10 IU/mL was considered as positive and a pregnant woman was presumed to be naturally immune; whereas the index value of ≥1.1 was considered Rubella IgM seropositive signifying recent or acute infection as per manufacturer guidelines. The sensitivity and specificity of IgG ELISA used was >99% (
      • Field P.
      • Ho D.
      • Cunningham A.
      Evaluation of rubella immune status by three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.
      ,
      • Rawls W.
      • Chernesky M.
      Rubella virus.
      ) while for IgM, sensitivity was 97.6% with specificity of 99.3% (
      • Chernesky M.
      • Wyman L.
      • Mahony J.
      • Castriciano S.
      • Unger J.
      • Safford J.
      • et al.
      Clinical evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of a commercially available enzyme immunoassay for detection of rubella virus-specific immunoglobulin M.
      ). Randomly selected 300 positive samples and 30 negative samples were re-tested at Institute of Microbiology Gottingen, Germany using AxSYM rubella virus IgG/IgM-MEIA (Abbott, IL, USA) as quality control.

      Follow-ups of the participants

      Telephone numbers for each participant were taken and an orange coloured sticker was placed on antenatal card of each participant for easy identification when they come for delivery. In addition, they were also asked to report their participation to the study as soon as they come for delivery. After every 2 weeks telephone conversations and text messages were made to follow up the status of the pregnancy. Most of these women had a plan to deliver at Bugando medical centre (BMC), Karume health centre, Sekou Toure regional hospital and Nyamagana hospital. Daily communication was made to a study nurse in each of these hospitals to ensure data and samples were taken.

      Outcomes measures

      New-borns of pregnant women who were IgM seropositive were assessed and gestation age at delivery, birth weight, viability, presence or absence of obvious congenital anomalies and other clinical presentations such as jaundice (yellowish or greenish pigmentation of the skin and whites of the eyes) were noted. Data regarding abortion and stillbirth were also collected. Neonates suspected to have congenital heart diseases were referred to the Bugando Medical Centre where further clinical examination was done by paediatrician followed by echocardiogram.
      Cord blood samples of the neonates were tested for the presence of specific Rubella IgM antibodies. The CRS and congenital Rubella virus infections were defined as per Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines (
      • Roush S.W.
      • McIntyre L.
      • Baldy L.M.
      Manual for the surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases.
      ); in which the presence of Rubella specific IgM antibodies and features such as cataracts or congenital glaucoma, congenital heart diseases, hearing impairment, or pigmentary retinopathy confirm the CRS while the IgM seropositivity without features suggestive of CRS confirms Rubella congenital infections.
      In the current study low birth weight was defined as weight at birth of less than 2,500 grams. Abortion was defined as pregnancy termination prior to 28 weeks gestation and stillbirth was defined as a baby born with no signs of life at or after 28 weeks gestation.

      Data analysis

      All data collected from this study were entered in the Microsoft Office Excel 2007 and later transferred and analysed using STATA version 13 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas USATexas.co). Categorical variables such as residence, marital status, occupation, education level, gravidity and trimesters were summarized as proportions while age and gestation age were summarized as median and its interquartile range. Pearson chi2 was used to test statistical difference of adverse outcomes between IgM seropositive pregnant women in the first and second/third trimesters while Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the difference of parity and IgM seropositivity. The Kruskal–Wallis equality-of-populations was used to compare the median age in different trimesters and Ranksum–Mann Whitney test was done to compare median gestation age of women with normal baby and those with adverse pregnancy outcomes/Rubella congenital infections. The 95% confidence interval was determined using Two-sample test of proportion. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

      Results

      Socio-demographic characteristics

      The median age of 685 pregnant women enrolled in this study was 23 (IQR: 19–27) years with median gestation age of 20 (IQR: 13–27) weeks at enrolment. The majority of participants 465 (67.9%) were residing in rural areas with the majority 490 (71.6%) having primary education (Table 1). About half of the women, 331 (48.3%) were in the second trimester while 315 (46%) were multigravid. The median age of pregnant women in the first trimester was 23 (IQR: 20-27) years, 22 (IQR: 19–27) years for the second trimester and 24 (IQR: 2.5–28) years for the third trimester. On Kruskal–Wallis equality-of-populations rank test the differences of median ages by gestation ages were statistically significant (P = 0.019). The median gestation age of seronegative pregnant women at the time of IgG testing was 19.5 (IQR: 12–25.5) weeks.
      Table 1Sociodemographic and obstetrics characteristics of the enrolled antenatal attendees in Mwanza city.
      CharacteristicsFrequency/medianPercentage
      Age (years)Median 23 (IQR: 19–27)
      Gestation age (weeks)Median 20 (IQR: 13–27)
      Residence
      Rural46567.9
      Urban22032.1
      Education
      Tertiary/secondary15322.3
      Primary49071.6
      Illiterate426.1
      Marital status
      Single9113.3
      Married59486.7
      Occupation
      Small scale business women45266.0
      Housewife18727.3
      Employed466.7
      Gravidity
      Primagravid28641.7
      Multigravid31546.0
      Grandmultigravid8412.3
      Trimester
      First17425.4
      Second33148.3
      Third18026.3
      Bold highlighted cases with confirmed CRS and those with loss to follow up.

      Seroprevalence of Rubella virus specific antibodies

      In 685 pregnant women enrolled and investigated, 629 (91.8, 95% CI: 89–94) were Rubella IgG seropositive while 61 (8.9%, 95% CI: 6–11) were seropositive for Rubella IgM antibodies. A total of 572 (83.5%) were IgG seropositive only, while 4 were IgM seropositive only. Fifty seven (8.3%) pregnant women had both Rubella IgM and IgG while 52 (7.5%) were seronegative (no detectable IgG and IgM) and thus susceptible to Rubella virus infection.
      IgG seropositivity was 154/174 (88.5%), 305/331 (92.2%) and 170/180 (94.4%) among women in the first, second and third trimester, respectively (Chi2 = 4.244, p = 0.120). Regarding the IgM seropositivity in relation to trimesters; 33/174 (18.9%), 22/331 (6.6%) and 6/180 (3.3%) of pregnant women in the first, second and third trimester, respectively (Chi2 = 30.6794, p < 0.001) were seropositive for Rubella IgM antibodies.

      Rubella adverse outcomes among 61 Rubella IgM seropositive women

      A total of 61 pregnant women were found to have acute rubella virus infection in different gestation ages at the time of enrolment. The median gestation age at the time of IgM testing was 14 (IQR: 10–19) weeks. Out of 61 women 6 (9.8%) could not be reached during follow up; some provided wrong numbers, some were not answering the phones or text messages and some shifted to another residence for delivery (Figure 1). The remaining 55 women were followed until the end of the pregnancy; of the 55 women; 27 were in the first trimester while 28 were in the second/third trimesters. Six (10.9%) women were confirmed to have newborns with CRS out of 55 women followed, making the overall incidence of CRS as 6/685 (0.87%). All cases of CRS were from women who were Rubella IgM seropositive in the first trimester of the pregnancy. Overall, out of 55 women with acute rubella infections, 46 (83.6%) had adverse pregnancy outcome including low birth weight, congenital rubella infections or congenital abnormalities (Table 2, Table 3). The overall cumulative incidence of Rubella congenital infections was 29/55 (52.7%). The rates of Rubella congenital infection by trimesters were; 16/27 (59.1%) for the first trimester, 6/18 (33%) for the second trimester and 7/10 (70%) for the third trimester.
      Table 2Outcome of pregnancy among 29 IgM seropositive pregnant women in their first trimester.
      Age (years)Gestation age at IgM testingNeonatal pregnancy outcomesRubella IgM in cord blood at deliveryGestation age at delivery (weeks)
      2010Stillbirth, Abnormal babyNot done39
      2210Congenital infectionsPositive38
      2511Congenital infectionsPositive39
      3610Congenital infectionsPositive40
      257AbortionNot done23
      2412Low birth weight, Congenital infectionsPositive39
      239Low birth weight, Congenital infectionsPositive39
      198Confirmed CRS (CHD)Positive39
      1913Low birth weightNegative40
      2012Confirmed CRS (Cataract)Positive37
      2013Congenital infectionsPositive38
      279Neonatal JaundiceNegative40
      1913Normal babyNegative39
      359Congenital infectionsPositive38
      2810Confirmed CRS(CHD)Positive40
      2810Low birth weight, Congenital infectionsPositive38
      3010Confirmed CRS (Cataract)Positive40
      1811Confirmed CRS (CHD)Positive38
      226AbortionNot done18
      2512Loss to follow upN/ANA
      178Neonatal JaundiceNegative38
      2112AbortionNot done20
      249Neonatal JaundicePositive38
      3011Congenital infectionsPositive39
      3510Loss to follow upN/ANA
      2210Confirmed CRS (Cataract)Positive38
      1911Stillbirth (spinal bifida)Not done39
      198Stillbirth (Omphalocele)Not done38
      1913Low birth weightNegative37
      Bold highlighted cases with confirmed CRS and those with loss to follow up.
      Table 3Outcome of pregnancy among 32 IgM seropositive pregnant women in second and third trimesters.
      Age (years)Gestation age at IgM testingNeonatal Pregnancy outcomeRubella IgM in cord blood at deliveryGestation age at delivery
      1823Loss to follow upN/AN/A
      1719Normal babyNegative39
      1728Low birth weightNegative38
      1930Congenital infectionsPositive39
      2030Congenital infectionsPositive40
      2116Normal babyNegative38
      2215Congenital infectionsPositive38
      2815Omphalocele, Congenital infectionsPositive38
      2016AbortionNot done20
      2124Normal babyNegative39
      1930Congenital infectionsPositive39
      2814Low birth weightNegative37
      2414Loss to follow upN/AN/A
      2115AbortionNot done23
      3530Normal babyNegative39
      2028Congenital infectionsPositive38
      2732Congenital infectionsPositive38
      2218Normal babyNegative38
      2016Low birth weight, Congenital infectionsPositive39
      2115Low birth weightNegative39
      2318Normal babyNegative40
      3516Low birth weight, Congenital infectionsPositive38
      2226Normal babyNegative38
      3028Normal baby, congenital infectionsPositive39
      2214Congenital infectionsPositive40
      2215AbortionNot done24
      1823Normal babyNot done39
      1719Loss to follow upN/AN/A
      1728congenital infectionsPositive40
      1930Stillbirth, normalNot done41
      2014Low birth weight, Congenital infectionsPositive38
      3627Loss to follow upN/AN/A
      It was further observed that, the median gestation age at the time of Rubella diagnosis of IgM seropositive women with good pregnancy outcome was 18.5 (IQR: 12.5–28) compared to 12 (IQR; 10–15) weeks of IgM seropositive women with adverse pregnancy outcome (p = 0.001). Further analysis revealed that out of 27 IgM seropositive women in the first trimester, 19 (70.4%), 95%CI: 53–87, had adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to 10 (35.7%) 95% CI: 17.9–53.4; of 28 pregnant women in second/third trimesters (p = 0.01). The rate of rubella transmission during the first trimester was 76% while that in the second/third trimester was 56% (Chi2 = 1.8900, p = 0.169).
      A total of 49 women had term delivery and 6/55 (10.9%) had abortion. The median gestation age of the women who had term delivery was 39 (IQR 38–39) weeks. The median birth weight of neonates with rubella congenital infections was 2700 (IQR: 2500–2900) grams while that of neonates with no rubella congenital infections was 3300 (IQR: 2400–3700) grams; two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney) test, p = 0.031.

      Discussion

      In Tanzania, the Rubella vaccination in the national immunization programme was introduced in 2015, targeting only children with no community vaccination programme. Additionally, the coverage of Measles first dose vaccine was around 80% with some regions reported below 80% (
      • Semali I.A.
      Trends in immunization completion and disparities in the context of health reforms: the case study of Tanzania.
      ). It should be noted that the main prerequisite, prior to the introduction of the Rubella vaccine, is to achieve a first dose Measles vaccine coverage of not lower than 80% (
      • Publication W.
      Rubella vaccines: WHO position paper—recommendations.
      ). Introducing the Rubella vaccine when the Measles vaccine coverage is low may result into a shift of average age exposure due to the presence of non-immune individuals and eventually increase the prevalence of CRS.
      This is the first study in Tanzania to document the outcomes of Rubella virus infection among pregnant women. In the present study, the IgM seropositivity was found to decrease significantly as gestation age increases. The higher Rubella IgM seropositivity in the first and second trimesters could be explained by the fact that women in the first and second trimesters were significantly younger than those in third trimester. Younger age has been associated with a high risk for acute Rubella virus infection, due to the fact that most of these women are still susceptible to Rubella virus infection as previously documented (
      • Lawn J.E.
      • Reef S.
      • Baffoe-Bonnie B.
      • Adadevoh S.
      • Caul E.O.
      • Griffin G.E.
      Unseen blindness, unheard deafness, and unrecorded death and disability: congenital rubella in Kumasi, Ghana.
      ).
      Another important observation in the current study is that the majority (84%) of women who were Rubella IgM seropositive during pregnancy were found to have adverse pregnancy outcomes characterized by spontaneous abortion, stillbirths, congenital heart diseases, congenital cataracts and low birth weight with six of them confirmed to be CRS cases.
      • Watson-Jones D.
      • Weiss H.A.
      • Changalucha J.M.
      • Todd J.
      • Gumodoka B.
      • Bulmer J.
      • et al.
      Adverse birth outcomes in United Republic of Tanzania: impact and prevention of maternal risk factors.
      observed various adverse pregnancy outcomes to range from 2.7% to 12% in a large cohort in Tanzania; therefore the overall adverse pregnancy outcomes in this cohort is significantly high. However; in relation to abortion (miscarriage) the observed prevalence is comparable to that of the general pregnant women population (
      • Keogh S.C.
      • Kimaro G.
      • Muganyizi P.
      • Philbin J.
      • Kahwa A.
      • Ngadaya E.
      • et al.
      Incidence of induced abortion and post-abortion care in Tanzania.
      ). Apart from six cases of CRS which were confirmed in this study; it was difficult to directly link the presence of Rubella virus infections and other documented adverse pregnancy outcome such as low birth weight. Nevertheless, rubella infections during pregnancy can lead to varieties of pregnancy outcomes due to devastating teratogenic effects of the Rubella virus (
      • Waldorf K.M.A.
      • McAdams R.M.
      Influence of infection during pregnancy on fetal development.
      ). Previous reports documented low birth weight in about 23–85% of newborns with CRS (
      • Feigin R.D.
      • Cherry J.D.
      Feigin & Cherry’s textbook of pediatric infectious diseases.
      ,
      • Reef S.E.
      • Plotkin S.
      • Cordero J.F.
      • Katz M.
      • Cooper L.
      • Schwartz B.
      • et al.
      Preparing for elimination of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS): summary of a workshop on CRS elimination in the United States.
      ), this could be explained by the fact that Rubella infection during pregnancy can lead to placental insufficiency (
      • Waldorf K.M.A.
      • McAdams R.M.
      Influence of infection during pregnancy on fetal development.
      ). Due to this limitation of the failure to establish attributable risk of the Rubella virus to the adverse pregnancy outcomes, there is a need for further studies to establish the attributable risk of infections in relation to pregnancy outcomes.
      Comparing pregnant women in their first trimester and those in the second/third trimester, significantly more adverse pregnancy outcomes were observed in women in their first trimester with all six confirmed CRS cases coming from this group. Previous studies have documented that about 90% of women contracting Rubella infections in the first trimester will end up with adverse pregnancy (
      • Miller E.
      • Cradock-Watson J.
      • Pollock T.
      Consequences of confirmed maternal rubella at successive stages of pregnancy.
      ,
      • Peckham C.
      • Tookey P.
      • Hardelid P.
      Rubella epidemiology: surveillance to monitor and evaluate congenital rubella prevention strategies.
      ,
      • Reese A.B.
      Congenital cataract and other anomalies following German measles in the mother.
      ,
      • Robertson S.E.
      • Featherstone D.A.
      • Gacic-Dobo M.
      • Hersh B.S.
      Rubella and congenital rubella syndrome: global update.
      ,
      • WHO
      WHO position paper on rubella vaccines.
      ). In the current study, this observation is further supported by the fact that women with adverse pregnancy outcome had significantly lower gestation age at the time of Rubella diagnosis than those with normal pregnancy outcomes. As documented previously, Rubella transmission rates were higher in the first trimester/third trimesters than in the second trimester (
      • Miller E.
      • Cradock-Watson J.
      • Pollock T.
      Consequences of confirmed maternal rubella at successive stages of pregnancy.
      ).
      The data from this study underscore the importance of screening and vaccinating child bearing aged women so as to reduce the Rubella associated adverse outcomes. This additional strategy in developing countries is highly needed due to the fact that management of CRS cases have been found to be more costly than preventing CRS (
      • WHO
      WHO prequalification of diagnostics programme.
      ). The cost of managing CRS case in upper and middle income countries has been found to range from 4261 to 57010 USD per year and is estimated to be high in resource limited countries (
      • Babigumira J.B.
      • Morgan I.
      • Levin A.
      Health economics of rubella: a systematic review to assess the value of rubella vaccination.
      ). Combination of strategies that includes vaccinating children below five years of age, susceptible adolescent girls, and a strategy of screening and vaccinating pregnant women after delivery has been found to reduce CRS to a greater extent than vaccinating only children below five years of age (
      • Bjerregaard P.
      Economic analysis of immunization programmes.
      ,
      • Gudnadóttir M.
      Cost-effectiveness of different strategies for prevention of congenital rubella infection: a practical example from Iceland.
      ).
      One of the major limitations in this study is underestimation of CRS cases due to the fact that these neonates were not tested for hearing impairment, as it is difficult to assess hearing impairment during infancy. Hearing impairment has been found to be the commonest feature in CRS cases (
      • Duszak R.S.
      Congenital rubella syndrome—major review.
      ). In addition, the lack of follow-up of children after delivery might also contribute to the underestimation.
      In conclusion, there is a high Rubella transmission rate in the studied population which contributes to the increased cases of congenital anomalies including CRS. Despite a good strategy of vaccinating children below five years of age in Tanzania, there is a paramount need to consider additional strategies to reach a goal of CRS elimination.

      Contributions

      MMM, SEM, SA and UG participated in the design of the work. MMM, MM participated in the collection of specimens and clinical data. MMM and SEM performed serological tests. MMM, MM and SEM analysed and interpreted the data. MMM wrote the first draft of the manuscript. SEM, SA, MM and UG did critical review of the manuscript which was approved by all authors.

      Funding

      This study was supported by the Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences to MMM

      Ethical approval

      The protocol for conducting this study was approved by a Joint Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences/Bugando Medical Centre (CUHAS/BMC) research ethics and review committee with certificate no: CREC/043/2014. Permission was sought from hospital/clinics administration. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant/parent/guardian/husband prior recruitment to the study.

      Acknowledgements

      The authors would like to acknowledge the technical support provided by Mr. Yusuph Mukama, Mr Vitus Silago, Ms. Caroline Minja, Ms. Damson Salema, Ms. Maria Mwacha, Mr. Paul Mvanda and Ms. Easther Pastory. We extend our sincere gratitude to all staff at Makongoro and Karume antenatal clinics, Sekou Toure and Bugando medical centre labour wards and Biomed laboratory, Mwanza for their technical support.

      Conflict of interest statement

      No conflict of interest to declare.

      References

        • Babigumira J.B.
        • Morgan I.
        • Levin A.
        Health economics of rubella: a systematic review to assess the value of rubella vaccination.
        BMC Public Health. 2013; 13
        • Bickler S.W.
        • Sanno-Duanda B.
        Epidemiology of paediatric surgical admissions to a government referral hospital in the Gambia.
        Bull World Health Organ. 2000; 78: 1330-1336
        • Binnicker M.
        • Jespersen D.
        • Harring J.
        Multiplex detection of IgM and IgG class antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii, rubella virus, and cytomegalovirus using a novel multiplex flow immunoassay.
        Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010; 17: 1734-1738
        • Bjerregaard P.
        Economic analysis of immunization programmes.
        Scand J Soc Med Suppl. 1990; 46: 115-119
        • Chernesky M.
        • Wyman L.
        • Mahony J.
        • Castriciano S.
        • Unger J.
        • Safford J.
        • et al.
        Clinical evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of a commercially available enzyme immunoassay for detection of rubella virus-specific immunoglobulin M.
        J Clin Microbiol. 1984; 20: 400-404
        • Cong H.
        • Jiang Y.
        • Tien P.
        Identification of the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein as a cellular receptor for rubella virus.
        J Virol. 2011; (JVI. 05398-05311)
        • Duszak R.S.
        Congenital rubella syndrome—major review.
        Optometry. 2009; 80: 36-43
        • Feigin R.D.
        • Cherry J.D.
        Feigin & Cherry’s textbook of pediatric infectious diseases.
        Saunders/Elsevier, 2009
        • Field P.
        • Ho D.
        • Cunningham A.
        Evaluation of rubella immune status by three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.
        J Clin Microbiol. 1988; 26: 990-994
        • Frey T.K.
        Molecular biology of rubella virus.
        Adv Virus Res. 1994; 44 (Elsevier): 69-160
        • Goodson J.L.
        • Masresha B.
        • Dosseh A.
        • Byabamazima C.
        • Nshimirimana D.
        • Cochi S.
        • et al.
        Rubella epidemiology in Africa in the prevaccine era 2002–2009.
        J Infect Dis. 2011; 204: S215-S225
        • Grillner L.
        • Forsgren M.
        • Barr B.
        • Böttiger M.
        • Danielsson L.
        • De Verdier C.
        Outcome of rubella during pregnancy with special reference to the 17th-24th weeks of gestation.
        Scand J Infect Dis. 1983; 15: 321-325
        • Gudnadóttir M.
        Cost-effectiveness of different strategies for prevention of congenital rubella infection: a practical example from Iceland.
        Rev Infect Dis. 1985; 7: S200-S209
        • Katow S.
        Rubella virus genome diagnosis during pregnancy and mechanism of congenital rubella.
        Intervirology. 1999; 41: 163-169
        • Keogh S.C.
        • Kimaro G.
        • Muganyizi P.
        • Philbin J.
        • Kahwa A.
        • Ngadaya E.
        • et al.
        Incidence of induced abortion and post-abortion care in Tanzania.
        PLoS One. 2015; 10e0133933
        • Lawn J.E.
        • Reef S.
        • Baffoe-Bonnie B.
        • Adadevoh S.
        • Caul E.O.
        • Griffin G.E.
        Unseen blindness, unheard deafness, and unrecorded death and disability: congenital rubella in Kumasi, Ghana.
        Am J Public Health. 2000; 90: 1555
        • Lee J.-Y.
        • Bowden D.S.
        Rubella virus replication and links to teratogenicity.
        Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000; 13: 571-587
        • Mashuda F.
        • Zuechner A.
        • Chalya P.L.
        • Kidenya B.R.
        • Manyama M.
        Pattern and factors associated with congenital anomalies among young infants admitted at Bugando medical centre, Mwanza, Tanzania.
        BMC Res Notes. 2014; 7: 195
        • Miller E.
        • Cradock-Watson J.
        • Pollock T.
        Consequences of confirmed maternal rubella at successive stages of pregnancy.
        Lancet. 1982; 320: 781-784
        • Mirambo M.M.
        • Aboud S.
        • Groß U.
        • Majigo M.
        • Mushi M.F.
        • Mshana S.E.
        Rubella seromarkers and determinants of infection among tanzanian children and adolescents in prevaccination era: are we in the right track?.
        Int J Prev Med. 2017; 8
        • Mirambo M.M.
        • Chibwe E.
        • Mushi M.F.
        • Majigo M.
        • Mshana S.E.
        Cytomegalovirus, parvovirus B19 and rubella co-infection among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Mwanza city: the need to be considered in Tanzanian antenatal care package.
        Epidemiol Open Access. 2016; 6: 230https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-1165.1000230
        • Mirambo M.M.
        • Majigo M.
        • Aboud S.
        • Groß U.
        • Mshana S.E.
        Serological makers of rubella infection in Africa in the pre vaccination era: a systematic review.
        BMC Res Notes. 2015; 8
        • Mwambe B.
        • Mirambo M.M.
        • Mshana S.E.
        • Massinde A.N.
        • Kidenya B.R.
        • Michael D.
        • et al.
        Sero-positivity rate of rubella and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Mwanza, Tanzania.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 95
        • Ndibazza J.
        • Lule S.
        • Nampijja M.
        • Mpairwe H.
        • Oduru G.
        • Kiggundu M.
        • et al.
        A description of congenital anomalies among infants in Entebbe, Uganda.
        Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011; 91: 857-861
        • Noah N.D.
        • Fowle S.E.
        Immunity to rubella in women of childbearing age in the United Kingdom.
        BMJ. 1988; 297: 1301-1304
        • Peckham C.
        • Tookey P.
        • Hardelid P.
        Rubella epidemiology: surveillance to monitor and evaluate congenital rubella prevention strategies.
        Perspect Med Virol. 2006; 15: 95-114
        • Publication W.
        Rubella vaccines: WHO position paper—recommendations.
        Vaccine. 2011; 29: 8767-8768
        • Rawls W.
        • Chernesky M.
        Rubella virus.
        Man Clin Immunol. 1976; : 452-455
        • Reef S.E.
        • Plotkin S.
        • Cordero J.F.
        • Katz M.
        • Cooper L.
        • Schwartz B.
        • et al.
        Preparing for elimination of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS): summary of a workshop on CRS elimination in the United States.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2000; 31: 85-95
        • Reese A.B.
        Congenital cataract and other anomalies following German measles in the mother.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 1944; 27: 483-487
        • Robertson S.E.
        • Featherstone D.A.
        • Gacic-Dobo M.
        • Hersh B.S.
        Rubella and congenital rubella syndrome: global update.
        Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2003; 14: 306-315
        • Roush S.W.
        • McIntyre L.
        • Baldy L.M.
        Manual for the surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases.
        Cent Dis Control Prev Atlanta (GA). 2008;
        • Semali I.A.
        Trends in immunization completion and disparities in the context of health reforms: the case study of Tanzania.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2010; 10: 299
        • Ukkonen P.
        • von Bonsdorff C.-H.
        Rubella immunity and morbidity: effects of vaccination in Finland.
        Scand J Infect Dis. 1988; 20: 255-259
        • Waldorf K.M.A.
        • McAdams R.M.
        Influence of infection during pregnancy on fetal development.
        Reproduction. 2013; 146: R151-R162
        • Watson-Jones D.
        • Weiss H.A.
        • Changalucha J.M.
        • Todd J.
        • Gumodoka B.
        • Bulmer J.
        • et al.
        Adverse birth outcomes in United Republic of Tanzania: impact and prevention of maternal risk factors.
        Bull World Health Organ. 2007; 85: 9-18
        • WHO
        WHO position paper on rubella vaccines.
        Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2000; 75: 161-172
        • WHO
        WHO prequalification of diagnostics programme.
        World Health Organization, 2011